Και επειδη αναφθηκαν σε προηγουμενο ποστ και εργασιακες γραμμες Αργεντινης ... θα επαναλαβω ενα παλιο ποστ του μελους krisai που περιγραφει τις εξετασεις εργασιας του Dogo στη χωρα δημιουργιας του. Πουθενα δεν αναφερεται η φυλαξη και καθε ειδους επιθετικοτητα προς τον ανθρωπο κ τα αλλα σκυλια ειναι μη αποδεκτη.
This it is the regulation of the Certificate of Apt Work or in effective Functionality in Argentina to evaluate to the Bulldogs presented/displayed to this test.
Objective:
art.1:
a) To promote the use of the Argentine bulldog as dog of greater hunting in pack, (mainly wild boar and puma), crediting and recognizing from the institution, to the units that demonstrate to meet the conditions necessary to fulfill the function for which was created the race.
b) To integrate to the hunting units to official dog-breeding, mainly to the scope of the exhibitions, so that they can generally be considered like reproducers by the criadores.
The “certificate of apt work or of granted functionality” to a unit will automatically qualify, it to compete in the category “work” of the exhibitions of structure and beauty.
Evaluation - Procedure
art.2: Sera condition to accede to the evaluation of the “apt one of functionality”, that the unit (male or female) fulfills the following requirements:
a) To have fulfilled the age of 15 months (minimum age demanded to compete in the category work)
b) To lack descalificatorios defects.
c) To have its cut ears (for functional reasons)
d) This chipeado according to effective norms in f.c.a./f.c.i or tattooing.
art.3: “Tests of work” will be called to the real exits of hunting with pack, where it will be evaluated to the unit, before two judges of work appointed by sub commission of functionality of the CDA, the one that will be able to establish a greater or smaller number according to the circumstances, always trying the subcommission to respect the spirit of the present on the matter.
art.4: The equipment that will integrate the test of work will be made up of a pack, conformed by a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 6 dogs; and a human group of up to 6 people, of legal age, within whom judges include themselves both.
art.5.1: In a test of work they will be able to be evaluated of 1 to 6 units,
being able to be of different proprietors, but whenever they integrate a unique pack. Photographies would be taken from the units to evaluate the day of the test, with which the subcommission took a registry along with the name of pedigree, I number of genealogical registry and corresponding chip or tattoo of each evaluated unit.
art.5.2: In the case of being more than the four units to evaluate, the judges of work to name will be three, in the same prescribed conditions in art.3.
art.6: The units to evaluate will be examined in individual form, but considering their interaction with the pack, throughout the development of the hunting.
art7: The “certificate of work” will not be granted, of not having agreement between the judges.
art8.1: If a unit is evaluated like “not approved”, the proprietor will be able to solicit up to two re-evaluations. these could be carried out by the same judges (to criterion of the applicant) or by whom it designates the functionality subcommission.
art 8.2: If a unit is approved with a qualification inferior to 9 (nine) points, the proprietor will be able to request a unique re-evaluation.
art.8.3: For the re-evaluations, the applicant, of not being in agreement with the appointment of the affected judges to the same, will be able to choose to ask for a judge more to his whole election (this election will be among the judges that appear in the listing of cda, chosen following a proposal by the functionality subcommission).
art.9: When being real exits of hunting, these tests of work for the obtaining of the “apt one of functionality”; they could be organized and be programmed by the proprietors interested in evaluating to his dogs, having in that case, notifying to cda with 30 days of anticipation. before the possible nonavailability of judges for the anticipated date, sub commission of functionality jointly with the interested ones, will reprogramarán the exit.
art.10: All the expenses that represent the work tests, including the transfer of the judges, will be the responsibility of the interested ones.
art.11: The functionality subcommission will program tests of work in qualified zones of hunting, for those who wish to accede to the evaluation and they do not have the average ones to realise them as it advises art.9 to it in these cases will be due to pay a tariff that will be determined by this subcommission.
Evaluation - Approved
Art. 12: With the intention of obtaining uniformity of criteria for the evaluation of a unit, the judge will have to do considering it the following indicators:
a) Sociability: The judge will have to verify absence of unwarranted aggressiveness of the unit to evaluate towards the rest of the pack, and its interaction with her.
b) Obedience: Its relation with the proprietor will be evaluated or guides; mainly that goes to the call; the attitude of the unit before the domestic animal presence, etc.
c) Resistance and speed: State will observe physical and of training that presents/displays the dog, that will have to support the march without difficulty, to draw for natural obstacles; to demonstrate to rapidity and predisposition at the moment at which the prey and until the reach of the same is detected, and to conclude the day with an agreed physical entereza to the circumstances that had appeared in her.
d) Sense of smell: The degree of development of this sense will be evaluated, considering the typical form to smell of the race, that is the high venteo.
e) Aptitude of prey: Due to the particular importance of this point, the judge will have to consider the multiple aspects that represent, like being: That they make prey immediately, I throw when undertaking the wild boar, zone where makes prey, position that the dog for defense of its integrity, reaction acquires before the punishment and wounds, etc; but giving priority to the tenacity of its bite and to its inclaudicable bravery.
art.13: To each indicator a puntaje is assigned to him, that is to say:
Sociability: 1 point
Obedience: 1 point
Resistance and speed: 1 point
Sense of smell: 1 point
Aptitude of prey: 5 points
Note:
These indicators are approved or disapproved in independent form; the first four if they are approved add 1 point each, and if they are disapproved they add 0 points each. The last indicator (prey aptitude), if sum is approved 5 points, and if sum 0 is disapproved points.
art.14: The judge will be able to grant an extra point by any quality that considers remarkable in the evaluated animal, or that this quality appears in the list of indicators or not (ex: sharpshooting bulldog, submission to the master in case of sutures, hunting avidity, etc.)
art.15: The maximum puntaje that can obtain a unit is of 10 points (9 of the sum of indicators + 1 extra point).
art.16: The unit is approved if it obtains a minimum of 7 points.
art.17: It will be undesirable reason for automatic disqualification of the evaluated unit, the following reactions:
To attack before any circumstance a member of the human group.
To attack another dog of the pack unwarrantedly.
To undertake domestic animal (property).
Not to make prey of the wild boar.
Art. 18: Finalized the test súmula with the resulting data of its evaluation, signed by the judges and with copy for the CDA will be granted.
art.19: To the unit that is approved it will do delivery to him of a diploma that credits that it has obtained “apt from functionality” or “the certificate of work”; this it will have a cost that will be determined by the functionality subcommission.
art.20: In case of not being obtained no capture, the test of work will be declared null. Reason why the option of art.8 will not be necessary.
art 21: If after 2 re-evaluations captures do not take shape, and the unit approved at least two indicators of the sum, the proprietor will be able to solicit to define the evaluation in a test of corral. the same will be realised in the place and the moment that subcommission arranges it to the hunting.
art 22: To the units that approve the evaluation as it contemplates art.21 to it, the “certificate of work” will be granted to them qualifies that to participate them in the category work of the exhibitions of structure and beauty, but will not be able to inhale to the title “work champion”.
